| Inhibiting forces |
Driving forces |
- Centralised government institutions and their authoritarian
practices
|
- Liberalisation of the public sector and decentralisation of
the institutional structure
|
- dominance of state institutions and excessive regulations on
interactions between the various stakeholders
|
- partnership and deconcentration
|
- paternalistic practices of decision making
|
- active participation of beneficiaries and those affected in
decision-making processes
|
- political and institutional corruption (land grabbing, monopolisation
of power, patronage, lack of moral accountability)
|
- auditing of government agencies to ensure social and
professional accountability and effective disciplinary measures
|
- uncertainty of land tenure
|
|
|
|
- comprehensive land legislation
|
- inaccessible land dispute structure and lack of finality in
the resolution of land disputes
|
- linking traditional rules and traditional advocacy
associations with the judicial system
|
- autochthonous land tenure system versus individualised
property and statutory law
|
- flexible multiple land tenure arrangements
|
|
|
- gender-sensitive approach and participation
|
- dissipation of local expertise
|
- co-evolution of local, regional and national and
international capacity
|
- monopolised information policy, rivalry and reluctance to
part with power
|
- transparency, easy access to land-related information,
fostering of synergetic effects through incentives and networking
|
- playing donors off against one another
|
- commitment and complementary international partnership
|
| (Zimmermann 1998) |