Guiding Principles:
Land Tenure in Development Cooperation

gtz_s.gif (1630 Byte)

Orientierungsrahmen:
Bodenrecht und Bodenordnung

Deutsche Gesellschaft
für Technische Zusammenarbeit
Abt. 45 / Div. 45

 

 summary.gif (3747 Byte) literat.gif (3793 Byte) deutsch.gif (2269 Byte) gloss.gif (3763 Byte)  index.gif (3790 Byte) contents.gif (3810 Byte)
home.gif (3805 Byte) full.gif (3790 Byte) frames.gif (2048 Byte) first.gif (3816 Byte) prev.gif (3811 Byte) next.gif (3831 Byte) last.gif (3805 Byte) 

3.5.3 Conflict-Solving Levels

The local level was and is the central site for settling land tenure conflicts in agrarian societies, i.e. rural areas. Autochthonous land tenure in which land, family and inheritance laws are treated as one unit remains the guideline for decision making (e.g. "Adat law" in Indonesia).

Local level: The key role of conflict arbitration

Pressing environmental problems, the implementation of the UNCED process and market economy reforms illustrate the importance of a decentralized system for conflict resolution. The systems keep the issues public and those involved present and guarantee that the problems remain near the people. The interactions between opposing crop, pasture and forestry user interests can only be determined as a first step in this way, and then comprehensive resource use models can be drafted.

Resource protection causes a renaissance
The rural land code in Niger

The Niger’s most recent land reform effort is the new Rural Code, which recognizes and empowers customary land tenure practices and institutions. The Code’s objective is to establish a national-level legal and institutional framework for increasing local participation in resource management. It recognizes customary ownership rights and incorporates local tenure and land management systems.

Considering customary tenure systems as a proper base for development, the Rural Code allows remarkable flexibility in dealing with land tenure matters without shifting away from the security of tenure that these systems offer.

(Herrera, Riddell and Toselli 1997)

This middle level for conflict arbitration has only been established in a few countries. These authorities have often been unjustly neglected (sometimes intentionally) by the government. An urgent need exists for strengthening these to enable them to settle conflicts over resources like pastures and forests and for deffusing arguments between pastoralists and crop farmers.

Regional level: an urgent need for expansion

A uniform legal body of the national states founded on Euro-American norms, areas of law and various stages of appeal can intentionally provoke conflicts of autochthonous law. However, it can also offer new forms of coexistence.

National level: the Euro-American "model"

The governmental administration of justice has primarily been applied in urban and suburban areas, for example, in disputes over the registration of private property. Trials are time-intensive and expensive since the process constantly has to be actively pushed and bribes are not uncommon. Here, indigenous, old-established owners often clash with external innovative farmers or speculators from the city (cf. 3.2.2).

Instruments of the new elite

 

 summary.gif (3747 Byte) literat.gif (3793 Byte) deutsch.gif (2269 Byte) gloss.gif (3763 Byte)  index.gif (3790 Byte) contents.gif (3810 Byte)
home.gif (3805 Byte) full.gif (3790 Byte) frames.gif (2048 Byte) first.gif (3816 Byte) prev.gif (3811 Byte) next.gif (3831 Byte) last.gif (3805 Byte)