Guiding Principles:
Land Tenure in Development Cooperation

gtz_s.gif (1630 Byte)

Orientierungsrahmen:
Bodenrecht und Bodenordnung

Deutsche Gesellschaft
für Technische Zusammenarbeit
Abt. 45 / Div. 45

 

Günter Mertins (1996):
Land Tenure Regulations and Land Tenure Forms in Latin America:

2.3.2 Types of small land holdings

The common term in Latin American countries for all small land holdings is minifundio, which include the owned and leased small farms, as well as those of illegal origin (see illus. 2). A minifundio is usually understood as a small land holding decimated, through inheritance division, into small or tiny farms (types 1, 3 and 4 in illus. 2), which occupies an environmentally unfavorable location, is traditionally intensively cultivated, although largely suffering from earth gradations (erosion damages!), and have no capital and hardly any machinery at their disposal. [FN 7] It is often a matter of farms from which the younger generation have migrated away from (types 1-3; illus. 2), but which also constantly represent potentially destitute farms, due to their size, the damaged landscape (small yields), and the debts created thereby.

 

Illustration 2: Types of Minifundios in Latin America

 

Criteria

 

Type

Forms of land tenure

Economic form /goal

Problem fields

1. traditional minifundio (minifundio tradicional intensivo) Private holdings, partially leased
(partial lease)
traditional-intensive; self-provided (subsistence)
  • reduction through inheritance division
  • farm size usually not enough for secure subsistence, additional occupation necessary, otherwise relinquishing of farm and migration
  • land degradation (erosion) through intensive cultivation, especially on inclinations
  •  
2. minifundio bound to large land holdings leasing
(working and partial lease)
agricultural-intensive, pasture economy-extensive; self-providing, often as an additional occupation on large farms
  • abandonment of land use through termination of the leasing contract and the following danger of migration
  • land degradation (erosion) through intensive cultivation, especially on inclinations
3. small "plantations" (minifundio tradicional de plantación) private holdings, partially also leased (partial lease) intensive, use of pesticides and artificial fertilizer;

oriented toward world and national market (coffee, tobacco, citrus; partially fruits and vegetables in the close agglomeration)

  • reduction through inheritance division
  • sufficient credits, cultivation advice
  • effects of world market price fluctuation
4. additonal occupation minifundio private holdings semi-intensive, horticultural-like;

self-providing; often weekend residence (with guards)

  • reduction through inheritance division
  • less interest from the owner and selling
5. colonization-minifundio (minifundio de colonización) without legal rights, i.e. illegal occupation (squatting) of public or private lands at first: traditional, self-providing;

later (eventually after the improvement of the transportation situation): orientation on regional marktets, more intensive capital

  • no access to formal credits
  • distance to market (lack of or poor transportation connections)
  • ecologic damage through slash and burn and a continued burning of the secondary vegetation
  • "Expulsion" through advancing large and middle farms

G. Mertins (1996) from Garcia (1967), Schejtmann (1980) and other sources

 

The most important types of minifundios in Latin America are listed in illus. 2. The representative description applies especially to the many, strongly dominating, traditional minifundio (type 1). The other types of minifundio, including small land holdings, clearly differentiate themselves from them (see illus. 2). Still, the major problems, with the exception of some small leased farms, are identical:

  • further reduction ("atomization") through inheritance division, therefore the necessity of
  • part-time employees, often as day-laborers, seasonal migration workers etc. or
  • giving up farms and migrating, whereby the fields do not necessarily lie fallow, instead being left to the usage of neighboring farms (for compensation paid in kind or in money);
  • high erosion damages or dangers through intensive traditional cultivation, especially on inclining fields.

The criteria listed in illus. 2 organize the small holders (campesinos) in three general groups, according to SCHEJTMAN (1980, pp.133), from an economic point of view:

  • poor small farmers (campesinos pobres), by whom the income from the small farm is insufficient to maintain their subsistence and are therefore dependant upon part-time jobs (especially types 1 and 2, also type 4 of illus. 2, which is to be judged differently); this is the campesino-segment in Latin America with the highest growth rate;
  • "stabilized small farmers" (campesinos estabilizados): the farm’s income is adequate to support the family and to purchase items necessary for the next cultivation period (especially types 3, 5, partially type 4 of illus. 2), as well as
  • wealthy small farmers (campesinos ricos, often with special cultures, also tobacco or coffee), whose farms make a profit which can, in many cases, be invested, which then makes a higher standard of living possible (especially type 3, also type 5 of illus. 2).

Primarily the minifundio types 1-3 and 5 are the subjects of rural regional-developmental projects. Still, they often vary greatly in their regional characteristics and difficulties.